Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1140520200240030107
Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services
2020 Volume.24 No. 3 p.107 ~ p.116
Chest compression efficiency for three methods of single-person rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Hwang Soon-Jung

Yun Jong-Geun
Kim Jung-Sun
Abstract
Purpose: We compared three chest compression methods to find an efficient method for performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for single rescuers and improving chest compressions quality.

Methods: Thirty new marine police trainees at the Korea Coast Guard Education Institute were tested for five sessions using three methods of single rescuer infant CPR: two-finger chest compression, two-thumb encircling chest compression, and two-finger support chest compression.

Results: The depth, accuracy, and number of compressions per minute of resuscitation were analyzed for the above three methods. The depth of two-finger chest compression, two-thumb encircling chest compression, and two-finger support chest compression was 3.53¡¾0.20cm, 4.10¡¾0.13cm, and 4.22¡¾0.15cm, respectively. Accuracy was 23.86¡¾12.59%, 54.11¡¾10.8%, 71.55¡¾18.81%, respectively, while the time for one cycle of 30 chest compression was 16.01¡¾10.5 seconds, 16.45¡¾0.85 seconds, and 16.56¡¾0.91 seconds, respectively. Chest compression interruptions were 6.59¡¾0.78 seconds, 7.17¡¾0.37 seconds, and 6.97¡¾0.35 seconds, respectively. The interruptions were consistent with the range of 5?10 seconds suggested by the American Heart Association.

Conclusion: When one rescuer performs CPR for an infant in cardiac arrest, a comparative analysis of three methods showed that two-thumb encircling chest compression is the best for accuracy and efficiency of chest compressions.
KEYWORD
Infant cardiac arrest, Infant chest compression, Two-thumb encircling chest compression
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)